RELATED PROJECT
RELATED ISSUE
BLOGGER
A lifelong resident of Kansas, Ashton Adams is a junior at the University of Kansas where she is majoring in Global and International Studies with a minor in African Studies. She actively works to...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.
To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (46)
Symposium on Religion & Democracy in the Foreign Policy of the Obama Administration
November 2, 2009
November 2, 2009
PUBLICATIONS (58)
Report of the Georgetown Symposium on Religion, Democracy and the Foreign Policy of the Obama Administration
June 7, 2010
June 7, 2010
Report of the Georgetown Symposium on Religious Freedom and National Security Policy
October 28, 2010
October 28, 2010
INTERVIEWS (75)
A Discussion with Amina Rasul-Bernardo, Lead Convenor, Philippine Council for Islam and Democracy
July 8, 2010
July 8, 2010
LETTERS (59)
POSTS (10)
RELATED RESOURCES: DEMOCRACY
Ashton Adams (Kansas) on Declaring Election Day a Federal Holiday
September 27, 2012
How can we fix our democracy? The question is a deceptively simple one predicated on a dangerous assumption – that is, that our democracy is in fact broken. Declaring our democracy dangerously diseased is a national pastime these days, but such a sensationalist statement requires supporting evidence. Therefore, to answer the former we must address the latter.
Using other healthy democracies worldwide as a benchmark by which we might evaluate our own system, it is easy to get discouraged about our domestic conditions. A comparison between such basic national statistics as voter turnout rates paints a dismal picture. The United Kingdom has seen a steady climb in voter turnout over the past three elections, with over sixty five percent voting in the 2010 parliamentary elections. France’s recent presidential elections saw an even higher turnout of eighty percent, remarkably a bit of a drop off when one looks at their 2007 turnout of eighty-three percent. For all our American handwringing, it seems that socialism does not in fact sap a society of its democratic fervor. In comparison, the United State’s posted voter participation rate in the latest federal election, standing at just over forty-one percent, betrays our public as positively apathetic. In fact, US voter turnout has not topped sixty three percent in a federal election since 1908.
Of course, this is just one measurement of a democracy’s health that ultimately fails to tell us about a variety of other factors. In fact the singular focus on elections as the determinant of any state’s democracy is a well-documented and lamented aspect of a phenomenon known as “electoral fallacy.” Declaring the democratic republic of the United States broken simply based on low voter turnout rates, therefore, is rather like Chicken Little extrapolating an apocalypse from a falling acorn. But just as we must not dismiss elections and voter turnout entirely, we also cannot give the US a clean bill of democratic health without considering these factors, for they measure citizen participation – that notoriously difficult to measure quality on which any democracy depends. Thus we must still work to increase voter participation, which will take more than good intentions. We must make a concerted national effort to establish voting as a cultural norm.
To this end, I propose that the United States declare the federal Election Day a federal holiday. While it is impossible to ensure that citizens will take the time out of a holiday to wait in line to vote – even when legally obligated, a significant number of voters around the world still choose to take the punishment rather than schedule the time – giving citizens greater personal time reduces the opportunity cost of voting and reduces the burden of voting. Most importantly, it reinforces the notion that voting is an important action in our society and should not be abandoned when other duties beckon. This increased engagement in our democratic process may not provide a cure-all for our country, but it will provide valuable public momentum for improvement.
Of course, this is just one measurement of a democracy’s health that ultimately fails to tell us about a variety of other factors. In fact the singular focus on elections as the determinant of any state’s democracy is a well-documented and lamented aspect of a phenomenon known as “electoral fallacy.” Declaring the democratic republic of the United States broken simply based on low voter turnout rates, therefore, is rather like Chicken Little extrapolating an apocalypse from a falling acorn. But just as we must not dismiss elections and voter turnout entirely, we also cannot give the US a clean bill of democratic health without considering these factors, for they measure citizen participation – that notoriously difficult to measure quality on which any democracy depends. Thus we must still work to increase voter participation, which will take more than good intentions. We must make a concerted national effort to establish voting as a cultural norm.
To this end, I propose that the United States declare the federal Election Day a federal holiday. While it is impossible to ensure that citizens will take the time out of a holiday to wait in line to vote – even when legally obligated, a significant number of voters around the world still choose to take the punishment rather than schedule the time – giving citizens greater personal time reduces the opportunity cost of voting and reduces the burden of voting. Most importantly, it reinforces the notion that voting is an important action in our society and should not be abandoned when other duties beckon. This increased engagement in our democratic process may not provide a cure-all for our country, but it will provide valuable public momentum for improvement.