BLOGGER
A longtime resident of the Eastern San Francisco Bay Area, Daniel Chen is a junior at the University of California, Berkeley, where he is majoring in Political Science and minoring in Public...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.
To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (61)
Finding the Common Ground for the Common Good: Toward an Evangelical Catholic Partnership on Public Policy
February 28, 2006
February 28, 2006
PUBLICATIONS (37)
INTERVIEWS (206)
A Discussion with Dr. Sangeetha Chavan, Professor of Microbiology, St. Xavier's College, Mumbai, India
May 20, 2011
May 20, 2011
LETTERS (226)
POSTS (71)
RELATED RESOURCES ON CATHOLIC
First Nationwide Faith-based Initiative to Fight Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV Launched in Kenya
Publication
Publication
Daniel Chen (UC Berkeley) on Pastoral Independence in Mixing Religion and Politics
September 4, 2012
“Faith has always provided a moral framework and vocabulary for this country to come to terms with its most pressing challenges… Faith—and the moral obligations that derive from our faith—have always helped us to navigate some of our greatest moral challenges.”
–Barack Obama
One’s religious faith is an intensely personal matter. But is it just that? Should personal convictions remain in the privatized realm, divorced from entry into the public arena? If you’ve followed my polemical rants on the Berkley Center website, which you probably haven’t, then you know that I believe “the moral obligations that derive from our faith” can and should influence our actions, especially choices made for the collective good. Nonetheless, are there instances in which actors should refrain from publicly endorsing particular individuals or political parties?
For me, this question was borne out of Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s recent administering of the benediction at the Republican National Convention (RNC). The antagonism between President Obama and his administration and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been well documented. The vicious attacks from both sides, notably the so-called “war on women,” have created general distrust between the two groups. As such, should Cardinal Dolan’s appearance at the RNC be construed as the “baptizing [of] the Republican nominee?” If it is, an ancillary question follows: has he acted responsibly in his office as a leader of the American Catholic Church?
John Piper, a prominent American, evangelical pastor, has noted that he disagrees with both Republicans and Democrats on different issues. He begins by differentiating between individual Christians and the institutional church, asserting that individual Christians have more freedom in airing their views as they are simply speaking for themselves, something that is not true for the church as an institution. Then, speaking as a church leader and pastor, he asks, “What strategies of involvement will preserve my freedom to be in peoples’ faces?” In effect, if one is perceived to be simply as a tool of either Republicans or Democrats, he or she loses a prophetic voice in either of the two parties. As far as I have thought this out, I believe that religious leaders should refrain from open endorsement of candidates and parties, even on political issues that are cut and dry. Preserving independence facilitates being faithfully present, especially with those with whom we disagree.
Providentially, it appears that Cardinal Dolan agrees.
For me, this question was borne out of Cardinal Timothy Dolan’s recent administering of the benediction at the Republican National Convention (RNC). The antagonism between President Obama and his administration and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been well documented. The vicious attacks from both sides, notably the so-called “war on women,” have created general distrust between the two groups. As such, should Cardinal Dolan’s appearance at the RNC be construed as the “baptizing [of] the Republican nominee?” If it is, an ancillary question follows: has he acted responsibly in his office as a leader of the American Catholic Church?
John Piper, a prominent American, evangelical pastor, has noted that he disagrees with both Republicans and Democrats on different issues. He begins by differentiating between individual Christians and the institutional church, asserting that individual Christians have more freedom in airing their views as they are simply speaking for themselves, something that is not true for the church as an institution. Then, speaking as a church leader and pastor, he asks, “What strategies of involvement will preserve my freedom to be in peoples’ faces?” In effect, if one is perceived to be simply as a tool of either Republicans or Democrats, he or she loses a prophetic voice in either of the two parties. As far as I have thought this out, I believe that religious leaders should refrain from open endorsement of candidates and parties, even on political issues that are cut and dry. Preserving independence facilitates being faithfully present, especially with those with whom we disagree.
Providentially, it appears that Cardinal Dolan agrees.