Millennials Disagree Over Solutions to Economic Inequality

For example, one student from the University of Chicago writes that no one type of economic system is the problem. Socialism and capitalism come each with their flaws. If our goal is equality in any system, the key is ensuring social mobility. Creating a society where social mobility is a priority means investing in education for all and ensuring that opportunities exist regardless of the home you were born into.

Another student highlights the systematic nature of economic inequality as a symptom of a deeper corruption. He suggests the solution requires significant sacrifice. In order to attack the problem at its root, Americans must be willing to give up pieces of their democracy in order to facilitate large-scale national coordination. American individualism gets in the way of progress.

As if to counter his point directly, another student argues that “the disparity between economic groups is the result of people’s rights to liberty and the pursuit of happiness that creates the gap in income." Accordingly, governments can do little close the gap of inequality without deeply infringing on the liberties central to American democracy. Unlike his peer, he is unwilling to see liberty lessened to facilitate changes in a system where the result of the pursuit of individual happiness is a necessary inequality.

A fourth student asserts that economic inequality stems from political apathy. Americans are no longer participants in their own democracy, and as a result the powerful are free to pursue their own interests instead of what is best for the American people. The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. She argues that political inefficacy has become a symptom of economic inequality, where the poor have either been shut of the political process directly because their lack of resources or indirectly by prevailing culture. The solution then is to reengage the marginalized politically to ensure equal representation.

Another student also blames our political system, “once touted as a model for the rest of mankind, has fallen into dysfunction due to a crisis of negative leadership.” The polarization of American politics has made traditional institutions inept for combating systematic problems such as economic inequality.

The proposed solutions presented here represent a sliver of the Millennial voice, yet it is clear in their diversity the problem is not getting young people to recognize the importance of economic inequality in today’s society. It is the challenge of the Millennial generation to agree on the causes of and attack effectively this growing social ill. For all the disagreement evident in writings of young people there is all a thread of hope. One student writes, “I believe that a depolarized political system, an increased discourse about poverty and wealth, and a rejuvenation of spirit in young people could bring about lasting social change.”