Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Home Berkley Center Home Berkley Center on iTunes U Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page Berkley Center's Twitter Page Berkley Center's Facebook Page Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page WFDD's Twitter Page WFDD's Facebook Page Doyle Undergraduate Initiatives Undergraduate Learning and Interreligious Understanding Survey Junior Year Abroad Network Undergraduate Fellows Knowledge Resources KR Classroom Resources KR Countries KR Traditions KR Topics Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Forum Back to the Berkley Center World Faiths Development Dialogue Back to the Berkley Center Religious Freedom Project
June 19, 2013  |  About the Berkley Center  |  Directions to the Center  |  Subscribe
 
Programs People Publications Events For Students Resources Religious Freedom Project WFDD

RELATED PROJECT

RELATED ISSUE

BLOGGER

Mohammad Usman Mohammad Usman is a senior at DePauw University majoring in Urban Policy and Conflict Studies, with a minor in Religious Studies. During summer 2012 he studied bioethics and completed a medical...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.

To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.

OTHER POSTS

Millennials on Social Media and Politics

November 15, 2012

Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity

November 12, 2012

Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials

November 7, 2012

Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work

November 7, 2012

Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo

November 6, 2012

Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials

November 5, 2012

Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy

November 3, 2012

Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens

November 2, 2012

Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling

October 31, 2012

Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation

October 29, 2012

Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election

October 25, 2012

Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus

October 23, 2012

Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation

October 4, 2012

Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy

October 4, 2012

Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout

October 3, 2012

Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster

October 2, 2012


>> more

Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution

October 1, 2012

Voting in the United States is an anachronistic exercise. That is, despite the enormous advances that technology has brought to all-important tasks such as paying taxes, managing finances, reviewing medical records, and the like, voting has largely remained unchanged by the forces of technology. Furthermore, in this country—unlike a number of other advanced democracies—voting is a one-day event; the absentee process notwithstanding, Americans report to a designated location and cast a paper ballot, all without any official reprieve from work or school obligations. The implications that result from this system are innumerable, but the most significant is low voter turnout.
This dated system of voting does not resonate well with the youth demographic. According to the Campus Vote Project, “Despite widespread reports of overwhelming youth engagement in the 2008 election, young voters only made up about 19 percent of the electorate. […And only] an estimated 24 percent of all eligible young people ages 18-29 voted in the 2010 midterms.” Put another way, even in the national election that was touted as the most appealing to youth in our lifetime, which counted more than 23 million voters under the age of 30, nearly half of eligible young adults did not vote.

The fix for this problem does not lie in campaigns to get young people to the polls; rather, the ballot box should be brought to them—as well as to all Americans. Internet voting is a solution that can dramatically increase voter turnout and fundamentally alter the character of our democracy. It would provide an accessible means for millions to express their political voices without having to wait in long-lines or miss work or class. And the tools for such mass political participation are readily available in homes and schools throughout the country; 78.6 percent of people aged 18-34 live in households with Internet access, according to the 2010 Census.

Some may argue that voting is far too important an endeavor to complete online. However, this warrants a more thorough examination of the tasks that are regularly completed online: paying federal and state taxes, banking, buying and selling property and products, etc. The technology clearly exists to make this a safe and efficient experience for all, one which promises to enhance our democracy and make the election of representatives that which it is supposed to be: a fair contest in which all citizens have a say.