RELATED PROJECT
RELATED ISSUE
BLOGGER
Mohammad Usman is a senior at DePauw University majoring in Urban Policy and Conflict Studies, with a minor in Religious Studies. During summer 2012 he studied bioethics and completed a medical...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.
To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (46)
Symposium on Religion & Democracy in the Foreign Policy of the Obama Administration
November 2, 2009
November 2, 2009
PUBLICATIONS (58)
Report of the Georgetown Symposium on Religion, Democracy and the Foreign Policy of the Obama Administration
June 7, 2010
June 7, 2010
Report of the Georgetown Symposium on Religious Freedom and National Security Policy
October 28, 2010
October 28, 2010
INTERVIEWS (75)
A Discussion with Amina Rasul-Bernardo, Lead Convenor, Philippine Council for Islam and Democracy
July 8, 2010
July 8, 2010
LETTERS (59)
POSTS (10)
RELATED RESOURCES: DEMOCRACY
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
Voting in the United States is an anachronistic exercise. That is, despite the enormous
advances that technology has brought to all-important tasks such as paying taxes, managing
finances, reviewing medical records, and the like, voting has largely remained unchanged by the
forces of technology. Furthermore, in this country—unlike a number of other advanced
democracies—voting is a one-day event; the absentee process notwithstanding, Americans report
to a designated location and cast a paper ballot, all without any official reprieve from work or
school obligations. The implications that result from this system are innumerable, but the most
significant is low voter turnout.
This dated system of voting does not resonate well with the youth demographic.
According to the Campus Vote Project, “Despite widespread reports of overwhelming youth
engagement in the 2008 election, young voters only made up about 19 percent of the electorate.
[…And only] an estimated 24 percent of all eligible young people ages 18-29 voted in the 2010
midterms.” Put another way, even in the national election that was touted as the most appealing
to youth in our lifetime, which counted more than 23 million voters under the age of 30, nearly
half of eligible young adults did not vote.
The fix for this problem does not lie in campaigns to get young people to the polls; rather, the ballot box should be brought to them—as well as to all Americans. Internet voting is a solution that can dramatically increase voter turnout and fundamentally alter the character of our democracy. It would provide an accessible means for millions to express their political voices without having to wait in long-lines or miss work or class. And the tools for such mass political participation are readily available in homes and schools throughout the country; 78.6 percent of people aged 18-34 live in households with Internet access, according to the 2010 Census.
Some may argue that voting is far too important an endeavor to complete online. However, this warrants a more thorough examination of the tasks that are regularly completed online: paying federal and state taxes, banking, buying and selling property and products, etc. The technology clearly exists to make this a safe and efficient experience for all, one which promises to enhance our democracy and make the election of representatives that which it is supposed to be: a fair contest in which all citizens have a say.
The fix for this problem does not lie in campaigns to get young people to the polls; rather, the ballot box should be brought to them—as well as to all Americans. Internet voting is a solution that can dramatically increase voter turnout and fundamentally alter the character of our democracy. It would provide an accessible means for millions to express their political voices without having to wait in long-lines or miss work or class. And the tools for such mass political participation are readily available in homes and schools throughout the country; 78.6 percent of people aged 18-34 live in households with Internet access, according to the 2010 Census.
Some may argue that voting is far too important an endeavor to complete online. However, this warrants a more thorough examination of the tasks that are regularly completed online: paying federal and state taxes, banking, buying and selling property and products, etc. The technology clearly exists to make this a safe and efficient experience for all, one which promises to enhance our democracy and make the election of representatives that which it is supposed to be: a fair contest in which all citizens have a say.