BLOGGER
Giuliana DeAngelis is a member of the class of 2014 in Georgetown's School of Foreign Service and is pursuing a Certificate in Religion, Ethics, and World Affairs. Giuliana is currently studying...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.
To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (95)
PUBLICATIONS (77)
2008 Undergraduate Fellows Report: A Leap of Faith: Interreligious Marriage in America
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2008
INTERVIEWS (348)
A Discussion with Wendy Tyndale about Gender Roles, Peace, and Conflict in Central America
April 1, 2010
April 1, 2010
A Discussion with Bishop Singulane on the Role of CCM in the Ending of the Mozambican Civil War
May 26, 2009
May 26, 2009
LETTERS (293)
POSTS (104)
RELATED RESOURCES ON CHRISTIAN
Open Mind, Common Ground ...Understanding What Really Unites Us
October 17, 2011
In a recent Los Angeles Times Op-Ed, comedian and atheism campaigner Penn Jillette claims that the word “Christian” is being increasingly employed by politicians to appeal to a wider base of voters. Further, he argues that this shift has been to the detriment of society as a whole. However, the same evidence could be used to argue that a positive shift has occurred - one towards greater understanding among those with similar beliefs. Perhaps it has even been instrumental in providing a unified voice for common concerns and beliefs.
Jillette also references the debate that arose in the 1960s regarding the campaign of John F. Kennedy, the first Catholic to be elected to the American presidency. He rightfully acknowledges that, in confronting concern and criticism over his faith, Kennedy reminded Americans that the real issues were finding ways to tackle hunger, fight poverty, and advance technology. Kennedy was able to convince skeptical Americans that regardless of his religious beliefs, he intended to lead a country of Americans, not only Catholics. In his Op-Ed, Jillette argues that this direct acknowledgment of separation of church and state would be unheard of in the current political environment. I believe Penn is mistaken.
Recently, when Texas pastor Robert Jeffress made inflammatory remarks directed at candidate Mitt Romney, calling Mormonism a “cult,” commentators across the board immediately called into question the relevance of Romney’s faith to his qualifications for presidency. To the extent that his faith affects whether or not Americans will vote for him, it is an issue. However, at its core, the issue of Mitt Romney’s faith should not be an issue in his campaign. If anything, it is a detractor for the issues that really need to be discussed – such as health care, employment, and education. In this respect, the debate is similar to the one in the 1960s, serving as a reminder to Americans that religion need not be a wedge driving voters apart by masking the critical issues that voters need to discuss.
Recently, when Texas pastor Robert Jeffress made inflammatory remarks directed at candidate Mitt Romney, calling Mormonism a “cult,” commentators across the board immediately called into question the relevance of Romney’s faith to his qualifications for presidency. To the extent that his faith affects whether or not Americans will vote for him, it is an issue. However, at its core, the issue of Mitt Romney’s faith should not be an issue in his campaign. If anything, it is a detractor for the issues that really need to be discussed – such as health care, employment, and education. In this respect, the debate is similar to the one in the 1960s, serving as a reminder to Americans that religion need not be a wedge driving voters apart by masking the critical issues that voters need to discuss.