BLOGGER
A transplanted New Yorker living in California, Spencer Nelson is a sophomore double majoring in History and Philosophy at Stanford University. Though he attended a high school with no newspaper,...
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.
To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (17)
Inaugural Symposium: Christianity and Freedom: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
December 14, 2012
December 14, 2012
PUBLICATIONS (17)
Political Demography: How Population Changes are Reshaping International Security and National Politics
May 31, 2012
May 31, 2012
INTERVIEWS (63)
A Discussion with Bishop Singulane on the Role of CCM in the Ending of the Mozambican Civil War
May 26, 2009
May 26, 2009
LETTERS (11)
POSTS (6)
RELATED RESOURCES ON RELIGION AND PEACE
Spencer Nelson (Stanford) on Human Politicians
July 31, 2012
Government has become a porous entity. By porous I mean that the buck stops nowhere. The buck – responsibility for failure, the burden of explaining to a wronged public – falls into the abyss while politicians lurk, waiting for more opportune moments. Barack Obama never said, “I’m sorry. Closing Guantanamo was infeasible.” Instead, after the issue lost its use, the subject was dropped without much fanfare (maybe an aide spoke to the issue). News cycles quickly replaced neglected promises with new ones. Millennials find that promises are made and broken easily, but have no means of ensuring accountability.
So politicians avoid the limelight, preferring to shy away into anonymity until they're certain of success. This elusiveness and the tendency to obfuscate, lest a sound byte bite them later on, are thoroughly confusing for followers of politics. There’s no one to accept blame when things go wrong and a host of people clamoring for plaudits when they go right.
The most confounded are millennials, who attached themselves to the transcendent Obama campaign. It rose above the mire of their confusion by alleging the rest of Washington lacked honesty. Barack was cast as a Washington outsider, foreign to these games of blame avoidance. But their trust in him has faded as it has with all of the political establishment’s figureheads. Among my generation, a sense of isolation from and revulsion of government is growing.
That’s not merely because Millennials need a better blame game with fewer escapes. They want forthrightness. It’s is a quality our politicians lack when it comes to the negatives and positives of governing. They will take credit for jobs increases that have little to do with their efforts and disappear when those same numbers turn sour.
Millennials are expert at understanding humanistically and inclusively. Contrived political personalities, however, are as inhuman as they come and are foreign to millennials. Consider high-level politicians as similar to financiers: they both disappeared (according to popular conceptions) when it came time to dole out responsibility for failures. To punish that, many millennials took part in the Occupy movement. Similarly, Obama offered the promise of shocking Washington insiders into right, human action. Young people thought Barack could force Washington into talking honestly with the governed. His promise has faded, so only 46 percent of my cohort are certain to vote in November. They see no humans in the political sphere, only a swelling number of PR machines. There aren't many politicians they can comfortably say they know and trust.
Too many politicians promise things, like jobs, which they are in no real position to provide. Millennials need a candidate who will speak honestly and realistically to them. They are the most educated generation, after all, and many see the vapidity of presidential rhetoric. No more Teflon presidents...the Millennials want a real person, someone who is not party to the Washington culture of sleuthing out of blame, but ready and eager to be a human: meaning, to accept blame when necessary and be honest about the state of the nation. Millennials want the straight dope, and hopefully then they will vote.
The most confounded are millennials, who attached themselves to the transcendent Obama campaign. It rose above the mire of their confusion by alleging the rest of Washington lacked honesty. Barack was cast as a Washington outsider, foreign to these games of blame avoidance. But their trust in him has faded as it has with all of the political establishment’s figureheads. Among my generation, a sense of isolation from and revulsion of government is growing.
That’s not merely because Millennials need a better blame game with fewer escapes. They want forthrightness. It’s is a quality our politicians lack when it comes to the negatives and positives of governing. They will take credit for jobs increases that have little to do with their efforts and disappear when those same numbers turn sour.
Millennials are expert at understanding humanistically and inclusively. Contrived political personalities, however, are as inhuman as they come and are foreign to millennials. Consider high-level politicians as similar to financiers: they both disappeared (according to popular conceptions) when it came time to dole out responsibility for failures. To punish that, many millennials took part in the Occupy movement. Similarly, Obama offered the promise of shocking Washington insiders into right, human action. Young people thought Barack could force Washington into talking honestly with the governed. His promise has faded, so only 46 percent of my cohort are certain to vote in November. They see no humans in the political sphere, only a swelling number of PR machines. There aren't many politicians they can comfortably say they know and trust.
Too many politicians promise things, like jobs, which they are in no real position to provide. Millennials need a candidate who will speak honestly and realistically to them. They are the most educated generation, after all, and many see the vapidity of presidential rhetoric. No more Teflon presidents...the Millennials want a real person, someone who is not party to the Washington culture of sleuthing out of blame, but ready and eager to be a human: meaning, to accept blame when necessary and be honest about the state of the nation. Millennials want the straight dope, and hopefully then they will vote.