RELATED PROJECT
RELATED ISSUE
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (17)
Inaugural Symposium: Christianity and Freedom: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
December 14, 2012
December 14, 2012
PUBLICATIONS (17)
Political Demography: How Population Changes are Reshaping International Security and National Politics
May 31, 2012
May 31, 2012
INTERVIEWS (63)
A Discussion with Bishop Singulane on the Role of CCM in the Ending of the Mozambican Civil War
May 26, 2009
May 26, 2009
LETTERS (11)
POSTS (6)
RELATED RESOURCES: RELIGION AND PEACE
Tiffany Taylor (University of Chicago) on Economic Inequality
March 27, 2012
“The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.”
- Aristotle
People often equate economic inequality to the flawed nature of capitalism, but perhaps the true flaw is our reasoning. Perhaps we humans have it backwards. Imagine a world where everyone is treated equally, a world where social ownership exists. Then what? Imagine the types of problems that are bound to emerge. Could exploitation still occur? Yes. Could unemployment still occur? Yes. Could a lack of motivation consume us all? Yes. So in effect, we could still end up a nation of people exploited, unemployed, and consumed by some ill. In effect, we could still end up a nation horribly unequal. This is because, contrary to popular belief, no one type of economic system is the problem. I propose a different solution; one that requires looking at the problem through a social mobility lens. I propose that capitalism or it’s alternative, socialism could never be the direct or sole cause of our nation’s woes. Our problem, regardless of our quest to become more capitalistic or socialistic, or some hybrid of the sort, is not economic inequality. Inequality in social mobility, the type that causes extreme poverty, is the single greatest problem facing America today. Perhaps John Ralston Saul, an international essayist, should have reformed his suggestion to, “everyone” should have “an equal right to inequality.” Perhaps this right is the only type of right we should be fighting for.
- Aristotle
People often equate economic inequality to the flawed nature of capitalism, but perhaps the true flaw is our reasoning. Perhaps we humans have it backwards. Imagine a world where everyone is treated equally, a world where social ownership exists. Then what? Imagine the types of problems that are bound to emerge. Could exploitation still occur? Yes. Could unemployment still occur? Yes. Could a lack of motivation consume us all? Yes. So in effect, we could still end up a nation of people exploited, unemployed, and consumed by some ill. In effect, we could still end up a nation horribly unequal. This is because, contrary to popular belief, no one type of economic system is the problem. I propose a different solution; one that requires looking at the problem through a social mobility lens. I propose that capitalism or it’s alternative, socialism could never be the direct or sole cause of our nation’s woes. Our problem, regardless of our quest to become more capitalistic or socialistic, or some hybrid of the sort, is not economic inequality. Inequality in social mobility, the type that causes extreme poverty, is the single greatest problem facing America today. Perhaps John Ralston Saul, an international essayist, should have reformed his suggestion to, “everyone” should have “an equal right to inequality.” Perhaps this right is the only type of right we should be fighting for.
How do we fight for equity in social mobility in order to eliminate extreme
poverty? We must focus our energies on increasing social mobility through finding
and creating opportunities rather than attacking some economic ideology that we do
not even fully embody, such as capitalism. Hence,
Blaming capitalism for the ills of income inequality is… incorrect. In a capitalist system, markets provide information to allow prices and wages to send signals for an efficient allocation of scarce resources. With diversified levels of educational attainment, different years of training, and other factors, one's marginal product of labor may demand a much higher wage than someone else. It is probable that there would be high levels of income inequality in a capitalist system. Despite this, the vast differences in incomes between households would be based on market forces...
Most importantly, and often forgotten in the shadows of American politics, is the unanswered question: If poverty due to social immobility, not economic inequality, is the true problem, who or what is providing an incentive to forgo movement up the social ladder?
TiffanyTaylor@uchicago.edu
Blaming capitalism for the ills of income inequality is… incorrect. In a capitalist system, markets provide information to allow prices and wages to send signals for an efficient allocation of scarce resources. With diversified levels of educational attainment, different years of training, and other factors, one's marginal product of labor may demand a much higher wage than someone else. It is probable that there would be high levels of income inequality in a capitalist system. Despite this, the vast differences in incomes between households would be based on market forces...
Most importantly, and often forgotten in the shadows of American politics, is the unanswered question: If poverty due to social immobility, not economic inequality, is the true problem, who or what is providing an incentive to forgo movement up the social ladder?
TiffanyTaylor@uchicago.edu