An extraordinarily demanding agenda will face the leaders of the G20, the world’s richest and most powerful nations, when they meet in Hamburg, Germany in early July. The global response to the crisis of forced migration belongs right at the top of their agenda. And the G20 leaders should take some lessons from the example of world religious communities, both in their common concern for refugees and in their practical commitment to action that will move us beyond the current grievously inadequate global response to the crisis.
Amidst the myriad conversations about violent extremism and radicalization, a distinctive voice breaks through the din. For generations, women have been at the forefront of advocacy for peace and have long shown a unique willingness and capacity to bring together rival groups in the search for common ground. In the women-led peace efforts of recent years, advocates have been successful in convening diverse actors and creating the conditions for consensus to be built. By engaging those whom society has written off and calling for reconciliation, dialogue, and cultural sensitivity to build social cohesion—not only as an end goal but as an operating principle—the voice of women peacebuilders has increasingly demonstrated its indispensability.
The European Union may bind together people across the continent, from Portugal to Poland. However, differing culture, language, and attributes remain. From German efficiency, to the British lad culture, stereotypes exist for just about every European group. My time in Spain has reinforced this.
There’s a palpable sense of urgency as leaders of the world’s largest economies prepare to meet in Hamburg, Germany early next month for the G20.
Mental health is something of a frontier zone in public health in many world regions. I have heard people scoff at Western preoccupations with the topic as a luxury of indulged societies. But mental health is a universal challenge, accounting for an estimated six to seven percent of the global burden of disease. It causes untold suffering, with effects that ricochet across societies. Stigma and discrimination accentuate the problems, arising both from lack of understanding and the grip of ancient beliefs and taboos.
Last week, I stayed in Seville for almost three weeks; the longest time since my first trip out of Spain. I had a week off from classes, so I spent my time celebrating—in the most Spanish of ways—by attending the Feria de Abril festival here in Seville. Literally meaning the “Fair of April,” the festival was unlike any cultural event I had ever seen.
Can the new science of mind and brain help overcome longstanding perceived divisions between believers of different faiths? Members of one faith may think of members of another faith as fundamentally different from themselves. Viewed through the lens of modern cognitive and brain science, however, the basic characteristics of a brain are the same no matter where it lives or in which religious context it develops. Thus, it is likely that the brains of diverse believers actually manifest belief similarly, and that shared neuro-cognitive pathways lead to the development of belief across disparate faiths.
The "Cognition of Belief” conference is convening leading scholars to explore this issue. Leading up to the conference, the Berkley Forum is asking participants to reflect on the following questions: In an era of "alternative facts," what exactly are the thought processes leading people to believe in some things rather than others? What forms the basis of belief, and what role do science, objectivity, and religion play in forming that basis? Does religious context affect the cognition of belief and, if so, how?
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global risk and a topic where religious actors have the potential to play significant roles. Partly due to the over- and improper use of antibiotics, AMR contributes to the development of resistant strains of diseases that can lead to longer and more complex illnesses, frequent doctor visits, the need for stronger and more expensive drugs, and potentially more deaths. The World Health Organization 2015 action plan highlights AMR as a deepening global crisis. In response, Georgetown University helped organize a conference at the Vatican in December 2016 where experts met to develop plans for religious NGOs, scholars, and policymakers to help combat the spread of AMR. Historically, faith-linked organizations have been integral in providing health services around the world, such as administering vaccines, facilitating health education, and bridging gaps between government health structures and local communities. Thus, they are on the front lines of battling AMR.
Christians have often been at the forefront of communication technology—from Martin Luther’s use of the printing press to make religious texts accessible to the masses, to religious radio programs, televangelism, and Bible apps. In April Pope Francis recorded a TED Talk to communicate his “revolution of tenderness” message, and many houses of worship have turned to technologies like blogs and social media to share religious messaging with broader congregations.
Since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi took office in 2014, more than 11,000 non-governmental organizations in the nation have been barred from accepting foreign funds. This crackdown curtails the flow of foreign aid to activities the Ministry of Home Affairs, which oversees the regulation of foreign charities, deems “detrimental to the national interest” of India. Few NGOs have been as vocal as Compassion International, a Colorado-based Christian charity, which was forced to close after 48 years on suspicion of religious conversion. Compassion International, India’s largest single foreign donor, donates $45 million annually and provides tens of thousands of impoverished children with meals, medical care, and tuition payments via local church-affiliated service centers. Numerous secular civil society organizations, particularly those involved in human rights and empowerment such as the Open Society Institute, have suffered restrictions and closures similar to Compassion International.