RELATED PROJECT
RELATED ISSUE
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (49)
2009 Berkley Center Lectures with Hans Joas: Violence and the Origins of Human Rights
October 26, 2009
October 26, 2009
2009 Berkley Center Lectures with Hans Joas: Punishment, Rights, and the Sacredness of the Person
October 27, 2009
October 27, 2009
PUBLICATIONS (29)
Female Genital Cutting: Cultural, Religious, and Human Rights Dimensions of a Complex Development Issue
April 15, 2012
April 15, 2012
INTERVIEWS (130)
A Discussion with Hassan Omar Hassan, Commissioner, Kenyan National Human Rights Commission, Nairobi, Kenya
June 28, 2010
June 28, 2010
A Discussion with Saad Eddin Ibrahim, Founder, Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies in Cairo and the Arab Organization for Human Rights
December 12, 2007
December 12, 2007
LETTERS (48)
POSTS (22)
RELATED RESOURCES: HUMAN RIGHTS
Amol Utrankar (Rice) on American Values
March 22, 2012
Are Americans united by a shared set of values? I would argue that the biggest problem the United States is our inability to agree on a shared set of values. This divisive indecision is omnipresent in current social-political spheres, from the controversy over the Affordable Care Act, to the dispute over economic policy during the current recession, to the current 2012 election process. The inability to identify with a common set of values is the most significant impediment to consensus and political progress in government today.
Consider the divergence of public opinion on the role of government. A 2011 Gallup poll indicates that Americans are nearly evenly split on whether government should actively promote traditional values (48% in favor, 46% opposed). Similarly, a Pew survey shows that 69% of respondents find that liberals excessively promote secularism in schools and government, but 49% of respondents also feel that conservatives have gone too far in imposing religious values. Party lines also strongly influence values on the socioeconomic role of government: nearly 78% of Democrats believe society would be better off with more equitable wealth distribution, a sentiment only 35% of Republicans share.
These numbers signal broad divisions on values and guiding philosophies. Generally speaking, we fail to agree on what we want our institutions to do, and where—in terms of social structure, economic equality, and spiritual value—we want our society to be. In effect, we are troubled by a net irresolution on what our government should do, which means that any firm initiative for change is watered down to a half-hearted compromise.
The debate over social spending issues captures this ideological rift. 77% of Americans believe government should serve as a “protector” of human rights, and most surveys show consensus on support for rights against discrimination or torture. Only about half of Americans, though, support protections of economic rights like freedom from extreme poverty or basic housing. Even more pressing is the observation that Americans are evenly divided on whether poverty is caused by systemic inequalities or individual lack of effort. Such disagreements influence perspectives on policy initiatives like universal healthcare or social welfare programs.
As such issues illustrate, the lack of consensus on what American values are and what American society should aspire towards are barriers to political action. As long as we struggle to define where spirituality, social equality, and political philosophy weigh into our value system and social goals, we are confined by the constraints of ideological discord.
These numbers signal broad divisions on values and guiding philosophies. Generally speaking, we fail to agree on what we want our institutions to do, and where—in terms of social structure, economic equality, and spiritual value—we want our society to be. In effect, we are troubled by a net irresolution on what our government should do, which means that any firm initiative for change is watered down to a half-hearted compromise.
The debate over social spending issues captures this ideological rift. 77% of Americans believe government should serve as a “protector” of human rights, and most surveys show consensus on support for rights against discrimination or torture. Only about half of Americans, though, support protections of economic rights like freedom from extreme poverty or basic housing. Even more pressing is the observation that Americans are evenly divided on whether poverty is caused by systemic inequalities or individual lack of effort. Such disagreements influence perspectives on policy initiatives like universal healthcare or social welfare programs.
As such issues illustrate, the lack of consensus on what American values are and what American society should aspire towards are barriers to political action. As long as we struggle to define where spirituality, social equality, and political philosophy weigh into our value system and social goals, we are confined by the constraints of ideological discord.