Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Home Berkley Center Home Berkley Center on iTunes U Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page Berkley Center's Twitter Page Berkley Center's Facebook Page Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page WFDD's Twitter Page WFDD's Facebook Page Doyle Undergraduate Initiatives Undergraduate Learning and Interreligious Understanding Survey Junior Year Abroad Network Undergraduate Fellows Knowledge Resources KR Classroom Resources KR Countries KR Traditions KR Topics Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Forum Back to the Berkley Center World Faiths Development Dialogue Back to the Berkley Center Religious Freedom Project
May 23, 2013  |  About the Berkley Center  |  Directions to the Center  |  Subscribe
 
Programs People Publications Events For Students Resources Religious Freedom Project WFDD

RELATED PROJECT

RELATED ISSUE

Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.

To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.

OTHER POSTS

Millennials on Social Media and Politics

November 15, 2012

Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity

November 12, 2012

Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials

November 7, 2012

Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work

November 7, 2012

Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo

November 6, 2012

Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials

November 5, 2012

Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy

November 3, 2012

Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens

November 2, 2012

Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling

October 31, 2012

Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation

October 29, 2012

Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election

October 25, 2012

Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus

October 23, 2012

Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation

October 4, 2012

Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy

October 4, 2012

Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout

October 3, 2012

Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster

October 2, 2012

Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution

October 1, 2012


>> more

AT THE CENTER

EVENTS (49)
PUBLICATIONS (29)
INTERVIEWS (130)
LETTERS (48)
POSTS (22)

Amol Utrankar (Rice) on American Values

Americanvalues

March 22, 2012

Are Americans united by a shared set of values? I would argue that the biggest problem the United States is our inability to agree on a shared set of values. This divisive indecision is omnipresent in current social-political spheres, from the controversy over the Affordable Care Act, to the dispute over economic policy during the current recession, to the current 2012 election process. The inability to identify with a common set of values is the most significant impediment to consensus and political progress in government today.
Consider the divergence of public opinion on the role of government. A 2011 Gallup poll indicates that Americans are nearly evenly split on whether government should actively promote traditional values (48% in favor, 46% opposed). Similarly, a Pew survey shows that 69% of respondents find that liberals excessively promote secularism in schools and government, but 49% of respondents also feel that conservatives have gone too far in imposing religious values. Party lines also strongly influence values on the socioeconomic role of government: nearly 78% of Democrats believe society would be better off with more equitable wealth distribution, a sentiment only 35% of Republicans share.

These numbers signal broad divisions on values and guiding philosophies. Generally speaking, we fail to agree on what we want our institutions to do, and where—in terms of social structure, economic equality, and spiritual value—we want our society to be. In effect, we are troubled by a net irresolution on what our government should do, which means that any firm initiative for change is watered down to a half-hearted compromise.

The debate over social spending issues captures this ideological rift. 77% of Americans believe government should serve as a “protector” of human rights, and most surveys show consensus on support for rights against discrimination or torture. Only about half of Americans, though, support protections of economic rights like freedom from extreme poverty or basic housing. Even more pressing is the observation that Americans are evenly divided on whether poverty is caused by systemic inequalities or individual lack of effort. Such disagreements influence perspectives on policy initiatives like universal healthcare or social welfare programs.

As such issues illustrate, the lack of consensus on what American values are and what American society should aspire towards are barriers to political action. As long as we struggle to define where spirituality, social equality, and political philosophy weigh into our value system and social goals, we are confined by the constraints of ideological discord.