RELATED PROJECT
RELATED ISSUE
Where do young people come down on questions of faith, values, and public life? How do they relate their values to public policy issues including education, economic inequality, and the environment? These questions, critically important for the 2012 election, are at the center of a campus conversation being organized by the Berkley Center and Georgetown University. This blog features an ongoing conversation about these issues between students selected as Millennial Values Fellows through a national competition. You can read and comment on their blogs here.To learn more about the project, visit the Campus Conversation on Values page.
OTHER POSTS
Millennials on Social Media and Politics
November 15, 2012
Millennials on Social Issues and Diversity
November 12, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Why the Presidential Election Matters to Millennials
November 7, 2012
Millennials on Religion and Interfaith Work
November 7, 2012
Ryan Price (Drake) on E Pluribus Duo
November 6, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on Unpredictable Millennials
November 5, 2012
Millennials on Affirmative Action Policy
November 3, 2012
Seth Warner (Vassar) on What Happens as the "God Gap" Widens
November 2, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on How Social Media Is Like Wii Bowling
October 31, 2012
Zachary Yentzer (Arizona State) on the Next Greatest Generation
October 29, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on Post-Racial America? Race, Millennials, and the 2012 Election
October 25, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on a Future of Hashtags #whatitmeansforus
October 23, 2012
Brice Ezell (George Fox) on How the People Can Heal a “Divided,” Partisan Nation
October 4, 2012
Hira Baig (Rice) on Religion and American Democracy
October 4, 2012
Tyler Bishop (Vanderbilt) on How It’s All About Relatability: Voter Turnout
October 3, 2012
Josina De Raadt (Dordt) on Mistaking Politics for a Hollywood Blockbuster
October 2, 2012
Mohammad Usman (DePauw) on the Internet Solution
October 1, 2012
>> more
AT THE CENTER
EVENTS (103)
PUBLICATIONS (26)
Diverse, Disillusioned, and Divided: Millennial Values and Voter Engagement in the 2012 Election
October 4, 2012
October 4, 2012
INTERVIEWS (198)
LETTERS (91)
POSTS (106)
RELATED RESOURCES: VALUES
Red and Blue Nation? Volume I: Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics
Publication
Publication
Red and Blue Nation? Volume II: Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics
Publication
Publication
Catholic Attitudes on Gay and Lesbian Issues: A Comprehensive Portrait from Recent Research
Publication
Publication
Matthew McNey (University of Maryland-Baltimore County) on American Values
March 30, 2012
Although Americans have principled disagreements on complex issues, we all share a similar set of values. The U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the many writings of the Founding Fathers remain as vital foundations for our values even in a rapidly changing world.
Barack Obama gave our generation hope when in 2004 at the Democratic National Convention he recited the words of the Declaration of Independence and then declared that there were no “blue states or red states, but the United States of America.” He struck an important contrast against the weak Democratic presidential candidate; he paved the way for his victory over Senator Hillary Clinton four years later and his general election landslide.
Obama’s bold rhetoric defied what seemed to be a growing sense of lethargy caused by the Bush administration’s incompetency and the Democratic opposition’s complacency. Obama’s 2008 victory was a clear repudiation by my generation of an era where rules were being broken, freedoms were coming under attack and where fear of being sent to wars oversea and dangers at home prevailed.
Obama seemed to be able to transcend the political turmoil as someone that this generation was crying out for; a leader who seemed to so clearly espouse his principles. The 2012 Republican Primary, however, has seen a dramatic realignment as increasingly the 18-24 age group has overwhelmingly supported Representative Ron Paul. This phenomena seems to be a result of how Obama has broken the promises he made during his campaign four years ago to restore many of our vital institutions.
Though Ron Paul is on the opposite side of the spectrum of Obama - certainly older than he is and absolutely less eloquent - this generation is ready to embrace him since he has stayed true to his principles while Obama has not. After all it was Obama who invoked the memory of Lincoln in a meeting with College Republicans and Democrats to justify his capitulation to congressional conservatives over the budget ceiling debate explaining that one must forfeit principle to compromise. Ron Paul has stuck to his conviction to constitutional principle that is clearly anathema to the cold calculations of a Harvard intellectual.
Obama’s bold rhetoric defied what seemed to be a growing sense of lethargy caused by the Bush administration’s incompetency and the Democratic opposition’s complacency. Obama’s 2008 victory was a clear repudiation by my generation of an era where rules were being broken, freedoms were coming under attack and where fear of being sent to wars oversea and dangers at home prevailed.
Obama seemed to be able to transcend the political turmoil as someone that this generation was crying out for; a leader who seemed to so clearly espouse his principles. The 2012 Republican Primary, however, has seen a dramatic realignment as increasingly the 18-24 age group has overwhelmingly supported Representative Ron Paul. This phenomena seems to be a result of how Obama has broken the promises he made during his campaign four years ago to restore many of our vital institutions.
Though Ron Paul is on the opposite side of the spectrum of Obama - certainly older than he is and absolutely less eloquent - this generation is ready to embrace him since he has stayed true to his principles while Obama has not. After all it was Obama who invoked the memory of Lincoln in a meeting with College Republicans and Democrats to justify his capitulation to congressional conservatives over the budget ceiling debate explaining that one must forfeit principle to compromise. Ron Paul has stuck to his conviction to constitutional principle that is clearly anathema to the cold calculations of a Harvard intellectual.