Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Home Berkley Center Home Berkley Center on iTunes U Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page Berkley Center's Twitter Page Berkley Center's Facebook Page Berkley Center's Vimeo Channel Berkley Center's YouTube Channel Berkley Center's iTunes Page WFDD's Twitter Page WFDD's Facebook Page Doyle Undergraduate Initiatives Undergraduate Learning and Interreligious Understanding Survey Junior Year Abroad Network Undergraduate Fellows Knowledge Resources KR Classroom Resources KR Countries KR Traditions KR Topics Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Knowledge Resources Berkley Center Home Berkley Center Forum Back to the Berkley Center World Faiths Development Dialogue Back to the Berkley Center Religious Freedom Project
May 22, 2013  |  About the Berkley Center  |  Directions to the Center  |  Subscribe
 
Programs People Publications Events For Students Resources Religious Freedom Project WFDD

RELATED RESOURCES: CONFLICT

Brian Grim
Person

Strategies for Peace: Transforming Conflict in a Diverse World

October 24, 2012

This report is the result of a semester’s worth of reading, investigation, and research into strategies for establishing durable peace and security in the global political context of upheaval, transition, and violence. More specifically, 15 Georgetown graduate and advanced undergraduate students investigated the question, “What works in peacebuilding?” Their findings are the substance of this report.

The report begins with a survey of the debates among social scientists, economists, political leaders, and practitioners about how to understand the contemporary context of global conflict. Through that participants identified two key debates around assumptions about inter-state vs. failed states/civil wars and around the factors that drive conflict. The next section of the report deals with the multifaceted literature on peace and security, finding that there is a cacophony on this topic, with everyone from military generals to politicians to peace activists using the same words (e.g. “peace,” “security,” “reconciliation”) with different definitions and radically contrasting policy prescriptions.

The last section of the report reviews the in-depth interview conducted by class participants. Most of the interviewees agreed that the real key to overcoming many of the impediments to durable peace comes from an appreciation for the specific conflict’s context; they also repeatedly said that integrated efforts by governmental and non-governmental agents are most likely to buttress peace, with a perhaps unique and critical role for social actors outside the traditional process.

>>  pdf