And you can certainly find it among politically conservative Protestants. For many, Romney is not even regarded as a Christian. The reasons for the tensions between Evangelicals and Mormons are not difficult to discern. Theologically, they disagree about everything from the nature of God to the size of the scriptural canon. Historically, the persecution of Mormons in the 19th century did not do much to foster an open ecumenical dialogue between the faiths. And given that both groups are inveterate, globe-trotting missionaries, they are quite literally competing for souls.
It was with this in mind that one would surmise that the Evangelical and Fundamentalist demagogues would not spare Romney their characteristic fulminations—give him a little taste of what John McCain got in South Carolina, 2000. A few exceptions notwithstanding, this has not come to pass. In May Pat Robertson invited Mitt Romney to lecture the graduating class at his Regent University. The late Jerry Falwell remarked: “If he’s pro-life, pro-family, I don’t think he’ll have any problem getting the support of Evangelical Christians.” “I have a deep disagreement with Romney’s theology,” said Southern Baptist leader Frank Page, “but I won’t rule him out . . . he’s the closest to the Southern Baptists in his social and moral beliefs.” “It’s not a deal killer,” said Richard Land referring to Romney’s religion, “if he proves that he’s the most viable social conservative candidate.”
I fully acknowledge that the opinions mentioned in the previous paragraph may be a form of politically correct ecumenical banter that no one actually believes. It could be a cunning strategy of dissimulation—praise Romney for now, stall for time, and find somebody, anybody, more agreeable to Conservative Christian sensibilities than the strange trinity of Catholic Giuliani, Maverick McCain and the Mormon from Massachusetts.
But if we’re going to be fair--and is that not the point?—the possibility should at least be acknowledged that the response by Conservative Christian leaders might demonstrate a few laudable civic virtues. It might indicate that they are willing to look beyond religious qualifications and focus on (their) issues (If elected Romney seems inclined to support overturning Roe v. Wade and a Federal Marriage Amendment). It also raises one really strange possibility: if a pro-Life, anti-Gay marriage, nonbeliever were to become a viable presidential candidate (!) they would support her too!
What the rank-and-file of Conservative Christians (as opposed to their leaders) really think about placing a Mormon in the White House is something we will learn about in January. For now, let us entertain the possibility that as conscientious citizens they will not let creedal considerations obscure their political judgment.