A June 2020 essay on “The Ironies of the New Religious Liberty Litigation,” authored by M. Cathleen Kaveny and published in Dædalus, explores why recent years have seen the polarization of religious freedom. Kaveny, the Darald and Juliet Libby Professor at Boston College, ultimately argues that applying the notion of civic friendship or the Golden Rule can serve as a corrective course of action. The Berkley Forum welcomes scholars of law and religion, as well as domestic policymakers, to continue the conversation on rethinking U.S. religious freedom in advance of the new administration.
This week the Berkley Forum asks: What were some of the major advances or drawbacks related to domestic religious freedom under the Trump administration? What policy areas should take precedence as the Biden administration approaches church-state relations? More broadly, why has religious freedom become a polarized and polarizing issue? Is it possible to (re)create a bipartisan coalition on religious freedom? If so, what ethical, legal, or religious principles could inform consensus-building on domestic religious liberty?