Berkley Center

I agree that this generation embraces the same core values as those who came before us, but I think that our interpretation of what those values mean is differs with respect to previous generations. While ideology and partisanship provide frameworks of understanding that are commonly used to answer difficult questions, many in this generation are finding that these frameworks are rigid, often conflicting one set of personal values with another. As a result, we do not bind ourselves to set models of value-based decision-making. We cherish our individualism but respect the role of government; we stand for family values, but push for progression on social equality. This generation provides hope amidst the current polarized political environment; our open perspectives and the desire to contribute offer us the opportunity to break free of political gridlock and work together to move forward as a global leader in the 21st century.

Akil Awan used the term “digital natives” to describe individuals who have grown up within a society where advancements in new media and information technology have already been established. To our generation, being connected to people and information from all over the planet is assumed. With access to information and exposure to ideas, our generation is developing a global perspective; we identify with other citizens of the world and support their causes. With more information from a variety of resources, we have the ability to craft balanced perspectives. Social networks provide us with the capability to participate in movements of collective action. As America develops a generation of informed citizens who act collectively to deal with issues and promote change there is no doubt that we have the potential to be exceptional. Abigail’s environmental science teacher was right when she said we would be the ones to change the world.

While new media and social networks have brought many benefits to our society, it is important to note the negative aspects as well. I agree with Daniel that the vast quantities of information have led to “summaries and sound bites”, which are narrowing the debate and slanting our public’s (and our politicians’) point of view. Brian’s assessment that this generation enlists in Facebook is true, but armchair activism is not enough. It certainly is positive that these mediums are spreading awareness, but the ability to bridge the gap between awareness and action will be the true determinant of positive change. The grassroots campaign that fueled the 2008 Obama campaign is a prime example that this can work, but 2012 will confirm whether such widespread collective action can be replicated.